Tag Archives: Intellectual Property

On February 22, 2017, the Supreme Court in Life Technologies v. Promega ruled that “a single component does not constitute a substantial portion of the components that can give rise to liability under §271(f)(1).”[1]  This ruling limits the reach of … Continue reading

Posted in Intellectual Property, Patent Litigation, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Life Technologies v. Promega: Supreme Court Limits Infringement Liability under Section 271(f)(1)

On March 9, 2016, in Charge Injection Technologies, Inc. v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company, C.A. No. 07C-12-134-JRL, the Superior Court of the State of Delaware issued a decision on a motion to dismiss for violating state champerty and … Continue reading

Posted in Intellectual Property, Patent Litigation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Litigation Financing Is Not Champerty: Delaware Confirms That Litigation Financing Is Here To Stay

Adrian Pruetz, Partner and Chair of Glaser Weil’s Intellectual Property Department, along with her daughter, Erica Van Loon, Partner and Head of the Trademark, Copyright and Media Practice at Glaser Weil spoke as the panelists for a special event for … Continue reading

Posted in Intellectual Property | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Adrian Pruetz and Erica Van Loon Featured Speakers at LAIPLA’s Women in IP Event “An Evening Oceanside Chat by the Strand”

Section 505 of the Copyright Act provides for recovery of attorneys’ fees by prevailing litigants. It states that a court, “in its discretion may allow the recovery of full costs.” However, no guidance has been provided on this language in … Continue reading

Posted in Copyright & Idea Theft, Intellectual Property | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on High Court Clarifies: Objective Unreasonableness Factor Favored in Attorneys’ Fees Analysis Under the Copyright Act

Through its recent decision in Halo Elecs., Inc. v. Pulse Elecs., Inc.[1], the Supreme Court discarded the mechanical two-part test governing enhanced damages fashioned by the Federal Circuit in Seagate, and gave district courts broad discretion to decide when to … Continue reading

Posted in Intellectual Property, Patent Litigation, PTAB | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Supreme Court Relaxes The Standard For Increased Patent Damages

The Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 (“DTSA”) was signed into law by President Obama on Wednesday, May 11, 2016.[1]  This new act is the final piece of the federal law puzzle regarding intellectual property protections.  Until now, IP owners … Continue reading

Posted in Intellectual Property, Trade Secret & Unfair Competition | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Connecting the Dots with DTSA

TVEyes is a media monitoring service, claiming, “to organize the world’s TV and radio broadcasts and make them universally searchable by the spoken word.”[1] Founded in 1999, the service uses innovative “audio mining” speech analytics technology to record and transcribe … Continue reading

Posted in Copyright & Idea Theft, Intellectual Property | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on TVEyes on the Prize: Clarifying the Law of Copyright Fair Use

Glaser Weil is pleased to announce that Partner and Head of the Trademark, Copyright and Media Practice Erica Van Loon has been named to Law360’s “Rising Stars” list, which recognizes top legal talent under the age of 40 with outstanding … Continue reading

Posted in Copyright & Idea Theft, Intellectual Property, Patent Litigation, Trade Secret & Unfair Competition, Trademark & Trade Dress | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Glaser Weil Partner and Head of the Trademark, Copyright and Media Practice Erica Van Loon Named to Law360’s “Rising Stars” List

As most practitioners know, even a duly issued patent can be invalidated under 35 U.S.C. § 101 if the patent’s claims are directed to a “patent-ineligible concept,” such as an abstract idea.  Yet, trying to anticipate whether a patent claim … Continue reading

Posted in Intellectual Property, Patent Litigation, PTAB | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on 35 U.S.C. § 101 – If At First You Don’t Succeed, Try, Try Again

On March 23, 2016, Glaser Weil Partner, Mieke Malmberg, along with co-presenter, Jason Angell of Freitas Angell & Weinberg, LLP, presented a one hour talk on changes in patent litigation to participants in a one day conference sponsored by the … Continue reading

Posted in Intellectual Property, Patent Litigation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Glaser Weil Partner Mieke Malmberg Speaking at “Patent Disputes for Our Time: New Realities, New Approaches”, Presented by the State Bar of California