Tag Archives: Inc.

In this third article relating to patent damages, we explore the effects of implied indemnification provisions when evaluating who is responsible for litigation costs when faced with an infringement suit. The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and California Commercial Code provide … Continue reading

Posted in Patent Litigation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Navigating Patent Damages Part III: Statutory Indemnification – Implied Warranty Against Infringement

On May 13, 2015, the Federal Circuit issued the much-anticipated decision in Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc. following a remand from the Supreme Court.[1]  The Federal Circuit, in a 2-1 decision, held that “direct infringement liability of a … Continue reading

Posted in Intellectual Property, Patent Litigation | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Federal Circuit Reaffirms Single Entity Rule for Divided Infringement under Section 271(a) in Akamai, Making Method Claims Difficult to Enforce

Although the Supreme Court’s decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International has been hailed by some as an important development in the efforts to curb abusive patent litigation by non-practicing entities, others have raised concerns about unintended effects.  For … Continue reading

Posted in Patent Litigation, PTAB | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Will 101 lead to mutually assured destruction?